Call for Independent Investigation into Auditor-General’s Conduct
In a recent turn of events, Deputy Attorney-General Savvas Angelides has advocated for an independent investigation into the conduct of Auditor-General Odysseas Michaelides. During an interview with Kathimerini, Angelides emphasized the necessity of following established procedures to scrutinize the actions of the auditor-general, particularly towards independent officials and others within the public domain.
Angelides suggested that the judicial council should be involved to adjudicate an application that would clarify what constitutes misconduct sufficient for dismissal. This call for an investigation comes amidst a backdrop of tension between the legal and audit services.
The audit service responded assertively to Angelides’ remarks, alleging that both the attorney-general and his deputy have been conspiring to remove Michaelides from his position. They characterized this effort as a form of retaliation against the auditor-general for his boldness in pointing out potential conflicts of interest involving Angelides and his connections.
Furthermore, the audit service highlighted several pending complaints against the assistant attorney-general. These complaints include issues such as the suspension of criminal prosecutions for tax offenses linked to politically connected individuals, the “spy van” case, and allegations of misuse of public funds by private company shareholders.
The audit service also noted the potential impact on ongoing cases involving former President Nicos Anastasiades, suggesting that undermining the auditor-general could lead to the withdrawal of all complaints. They praised the current President Nikos Christodoulides for acknowledging the auditor-general’s exemplary performance and referenced commendations from international organizations on the progress made by the audit service in combating corruption.
In a defiant tone, the audit service declared that they are not subordinate to the legal service and that the supreme court will ultimately deliver a fair judgment. They announced plans to inform Intosai and the European Commission about alleged obstructions to their work, which they believe will be featured in upcoming reports on the rule of law.
The unfolding situation underscores the complexities within Cyprus’ legal and governmental structures, as high-ranking officials navigate the delicate balance between oversight and independence.
